When the MPIG was introduced, the DoH FAQs on the MPIG stated "there is a permanent committment to the principle of this guarantee." Presumably permament in DoH speak means four years? Three points here:
1. No pay rise for three years is a pay cut that has already been made. GPs profits are falling by 7-10% per annum
2. The Darzi suggestion is that the fact the MPIG is not list sensitive and is therefore an obstacle to patient choice is a smokescreen. If it's a problem, make it list sensitive. I suspect most GPs would accept this.
3. You can't negotiate with a bully. Athelred the Unready tried with Danegeld and Chamberlaine with paper promises.
Laurence Slavin